Policy Forum Report

The growing proliferation of technologies for personal detection and identification has to a large extent blurred the lines between the public and the private. Growing number of national and local agencies are outsourcing their security operations. Critics warn that the rush to privatize might offer short-term benefits, while jeopardizing long term citizens’ civil rights and State prerogatives. The European Data Protection Supervisor has recently considered that “reception of the application form and taking of the biometric identifiers could be carried out by an external service provider” though “outsourcing the processing of visa application to a private company should be admissible only if it involves a place under diplomatic protection, and is based on contractual clauses providing for effective oversight and liability of the contractor”. No doubts that this opinion is drafted with great care and attention for data protection. However, there are also little doubts that having the processing of visa applications carried out by an external service provider in a third country has a number of consequences in terms of the protection of the very sensitive data collected. Still more seriously we are before a paradigm shift. Historically the coincidence between state, nation and territory made it possible for the State to offer in the same while security and identity management to its citizens. In a world in which such coincidence tends to dissolve - where identity management could be ensured more efficiently by private software companies - should a new constitutional pact between the state and its citizens be required?

Policy Forum Report

Postby VictorLee on Mon Jul 06, 2009 5:58 pm

Please find attached a draft copy of the Outsourcing Policy Forum Report. We would appreciate your thoughts and comments on the document. Please also feel free to share this document with your colleagues and peers. Their feedback is important to making sure we arrive at the strongest final product for the European Commission at the end of the HIDE project.

Thanks,

Victor
Attachments
Policy Forum Report.pdf
(84.8 KiB) Downloaded 36 times
VictorLee
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 10:09 pm

Re: Policy Forum Report

Postby diducu on Fri Nov 06, 2009 5:34 pm

System Interoperability
The most accepted definition of “Interoperability” is the ability of two or more systems or components to exchange information and to use the information that has been exchanged. Interoperability is an essential component of security systems and surveillance programmes. This is more evident in certain fields such as border crossing. Border security is a priority with most of the world’s governments. The increase of interoperability, and the proliferation of public and private databases, are generating an increasing demand to pool data from diverse technologies (e.g. RFID, biometrics, GPS, smart ID cards, etc) and from diverse applications and systems (signals intelligence, Automatic Number Plate Recognition, electronic patient records, DNA databases, etc). This raises concerns for many reasons, not the least because sophisticated ‘data-mining’ techniques enable discovery of unknown and non-obvious relationships within sets of information. Privacy advocates all around the world warn against risks entailed by interoperability. At the same time, interoperability is an effective way to fight terrorism and crime. Interoperability may also protect privacy by “ensuring that personal data processing complies with applicable laws” and provided that “Data minimisation and purpose specification should be built into data analysis systems (as “a priori” conditions for integrating information)”.
diducu
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 5:21 pm


Return to Outsourcing of Systems for Detection-Identification-Authentication

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron